This text presents a critical examination of the concept of scientific objectivity, arguing that it is inherently contradictory and necessitates a fundamental philosophical reassessment. The author highlights how traditional scientific frameworks strive for the complete elimination of the scientist's subjectivity, despite the fact that no knowledge or science is possible without an active subject as its agent. This contradictory demand creates a paradoxical situation where subjectivity must be constantly present in the scientific process, yet methodologically treated as a negligible factor with no impact on the reality under investigation. The author contends that what we commonly define as "objective reality" is, in essence, a construct of the subject. He criticizes the deeply rooted tendency in European thought toward perpetual objectification and emphasizes that science alone lacks the competence to resolve this profound methodological conflict without external philosophical critique. The abstract underscores the necessity of viewing objectivity not as an absolute truth, but as a problematic construct whose validity must always be critically evaluated within the limits of its practical application.