This study explores the concept of "Negative Aristotelianism," inspired by Jan Patočka's idea of negative Platonism. The author examines the possibility of interpreting the Aristotelian form (morphé) not as a fixed entity, but as a "non-given" or "non-being" principle that manifests through movement. This movement transforms potentiality (dynamis) into actuality (energeia), implying that what is being realized is not yet fully real. However, the article critically evaluates the feasibility of such a reinterpretation. It points out that it would require a radical intervention into Aristotelian ontology, as the status of both form and matter (hylé) would have to be viewed meontologically. Unlike Patočka's approach to Platonism, applying negative thinking to Aristotle might lead to an excessive weakening of the connection to original Aristotelian concepts, particularly the notion of entelechy. Thus, the study outlines the limits of deconstructing classical metaphysics within the peripatetic tradition.