This philosophical reflection examines Husserl's conception of ontology as the construction of a logos for possible worlds, exploring the tension between formal ontology and facticity. The text contrasts the general science of possible forms—those structures disjunctively necessary for any potential world—with the specific ontology required to understand our factually given world. The author expresses critical surprise at the unsubstantiated expectation that a universal ontological framework can be established where our actual world is treated merely as one instance among many equivalent possibilities. The central question raised concerns the ontological status of the logos itself: is the logos of our actual, real world as 'existent' or real as the logos of worlds that are merely possible? By raising this problem, the author challenges the validity of phenomenological constructions that attempt to subordinate the uniqueness of factual existence to general categories of logical possibility within the context of Husserl's First Philosophy.