This text analyzes the concept of "telicity" (téličnost), a term introduced by J. B. Kozák to avoid the problematic connotations of "teleology." The author adopts and refines this term to describe processes directed toward a goal (telos) without being strictly predetermined, contrasting this view with the Aristotelian tradition. Unlike teleology, which often implies a rational plan (logos) or a fixed destiny, telicity emphasizes a dynamic orientation where the end state is not given in advance. The appearance of predetermination is often merely a statistical result of repeated occurrences. A central thesis of the text is that telic processes exhibit continuity where each stage builds upon the previous one, yet they are influenced by a "pressure" or tendency toward progress. This influence originates not from the past, but from the future acting upon the present—a non-objective, "non-existent" pressure. Thus, telicity provides a philosophical framework for understanding goal-directedness and evolutionary improvement as an open-ended process rather than a fulfilled blueprint.