This text provides a critical reflection on the contemporary phenomenon of "evolutionary" thinking, which has dominated various academic disciplines from ethics to psychology in recent decades. While the author appreciates the shift away from traditional metaphysics and the concept of immutable substances, he warns against the superficial generalization of evolutionary theory. The primary critique is directed at the lack of deeper philosophical grounding and the insufficient definition of terms such as "evolution" or "development." The text points out that although processualism inspired by Whitehead challenged previously rigid understandings of the world, it failed to conceptually distinguish between general processuality and "true events." Consequently, modern evolutionary theories often lack a solid foundation and fall into factual errors. The author suggests that thought should move beyond the framework of mere "being" and "concrescence" toward the sphere of non-objectivity and new forms of temporality. The goal is not a return to immutability, but rather finding a more adequate way to describe dynamic reality that avoids fashionable simplifications.