This reflection critiques Lucette Valensi's question regarding the criteria for establishing the comparability of two different entities. The author argues that the very act of considering two items together as a pair implies that an initial comparison has already occurred. Comparability does not need to be established beforehand, as it is inherent in the recognition of duality. Instead of questioning whether comparison is possible, researchers should focus on determining the degree of similarity and difference between specific characteristics or aspects of the subjects. The text further challenges the title of Dalibor Antalík's book, "How to Compare the Incomparable," viewing it as internally contradictory. If entities were truly incomparable, they could never be brought together for analysis. Thus, the term incomparability is often used colloquially to mean only an apparent or perceived difficulty in comparison. The piece contributes to the methodological debate on the nature of comparative approaches in the humanities, where comparison is treated as a fundamental cognitive operation.