This document explores the concept of non-objectivity as a vital contemporary philosophical theme. The author argues that reflections on non-objectivity and the development of new intellectual tools are crucial in addressing two dominant yet problematic trends: the rise of postmodern skepticism, which challenges scientific rigor, and the rigid conservatism of scientists who cling to objectivist fundamentalism. The text highlights that modern science is heavily influenced by a one-sided, objectifying mode of thought rooted in ancient Greek philosophy. While this approach has proven successful in certain domains, it increasingly fails to address other dimensions of reality. Currently, any critique of objectifying thought is caught in a crossfire—dismissed by traditionalists as postmodernist propaganda or misused by proponents of pseudoscience. The author calls for a new conceptual framework to study the non-objective aspects of reality, suggesting that while this path is promising for future progress, it currently faces significant resistance from both sides of the intellectual divide.