The text explores the unique position of philosophy regarding professional specialization, contrasting it with the approach of scientific researchers. The author argues that unlike scientists, who must specialize, a philosopher cannot and must not specialize if they are to fulfill their role. However, this assertion requires careful qualification. Top-tier scientists also cannot neglect broader contexts, as discoveries in distant disciplines often prove relevant to their own research, sometimes necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration. Conversely, a philosopher must delve into depth and detail to avoid dilettantism. This involves precise knowledge of methodology, including the limitations of various approaches, even when they seem unrelated to the immediate philosophical inquiry. The text suggests that while science tends toward specialization tempered by context, philosophy demands a holistic perspective that nonetheless requires rigorous attention to detail. Ultimately, the refusal of specialization in philosophy represents a commitment to universal openness and a critical reflection on the theoretical foundations that transcend the boundaries of individual academic disciplines.