This text offers a critical response to Ruda Battěk's reflections on political plurality, in which Battěk attempts to ground human freedom and the existence of differing opinions on a biological basis. Battěk likens having a personal opinion to a natural biological function, a claim the author rejects as nonsensical. The text argues that nature is characterized by high physiological and behavioral conformity due to stereotypical environments. True human distinctness is not found at the biochemical or anatomical level, but rather at the psychological level. However, even psychological processes undergo a form of unification through language, speech, and thought, enabling intersubjective communication. It is in this sphere, rather than through biological determinism, that human opinion and the space for plurality are constituted. The author emphasizes that human thought transcends biological parameters, moving toward a social and communicative dimension where creativity and diversity of opinion can fully flourish and expand beyond individual isolation.