This text presents a critical analysis of Hans Wagner's theoretical framework, which identifies four fundamental components of a "theoretical structure": the thinking subject, the object of thought, the acts of thinking, and the resulting products. The author proposes the alternative term "thought situation" and argues that Wagner’s schema is overly simplified and contains significant errors. A central focus is placed on the "object of thought," which the author asserts can be autonomous even when it does not correspond to objective reality. Furthermore, the text examines the nature of thinking acts, distinguishing them from a mere stream of consciousness and emphasizing their historical evolution toward conceptual precision in European philosophy. The author also notes the insufficient scientific understanding of thought products and concludes that the current four-element model is inadequate for describing the true nature of human thought. Consequently, the essay calls for a broader, more nuanced investigation into the complexity of the thinking process and its various constituents.