This text reflects on Aristotle's division of philosophy into "first" and "second" disciplines. Although this classification cannot be adopted in its entirety, the author acknowledges the existence of specific philosophical problems that belong exclusively to first philosophy and cannot be adequately addressed by other disciplines. However, this distinct area should not be viewed as an isolated science, but rather as an integral part of philosophical inquiry. The reflection further explores the historical link between philosophy and geometry, suggesting a possible "rebirth" of philosophy alongside a new partner. While rheology (the study of flow) might seem like a suitable candidate at first glance, the author rejects it as insufficient for capturing the world's complexity. Instead, he proposes an ontology based on events (event-centered happening). Events are understood as concrete (concrescent) elements that are ontologically primary and precede any flow or collective movement. The aim of the text is to defend the relevance of first philosophy within the context of modern thinking oriented toward process and the dynamic, event-based nature of reality.