This text examines the relationship between philosophy and its history, critically evaluating the role of textbooks. The author argues that historical surveys provide only preliminary information and cannot replace a direct encounter with original thinkers. Citing Jan Patočka, the text suggests that reading a few pages of Plato is more valuable than studying an entire handbook. The core of philosophical education lies in the ability to read primary texts, which offer a unique path to the actual process of human thought. While secondary literature is helpful, particularly when specialized, it can never substitute for original works. A distinct category involves histories serving as a backdrop for an author's own philosophy, such as the work of Emanuel Rádl. Here, the value lies in the author's personal insight rather than historical precision. Ultimately, true philosophical engagement requires navigating the thinkers' own paths through their original writings rather than relying on simplified summaries.