The text criticizes the ecological and 'green' movements for unknowingly reviving a Romantic prejudice that views nature as inherently good, harmonious, or even divine. This perspective ignores the reality that the natural world is defined by constant tension, conflict, parasitism, and predation. The author highlights a fundamental logical contradiction in this idealization: if we consider the natural order to be inherently correct, we must either accept all human activities as legitimate natural phenomena or unconditionally submit to all natural processes, including diseases and infections. This would ultimately lead to the rejection of modern medicine and any corrective interventions in natural occurrences. The analysis reveals that modern environmentalism often relies on moral projections rather than objective biological reality. Instead of a scientific understanding of ecosystems, the movement returns to outdated myths about the sanctity of nature, leading to absurd conclusions regarding human health and social progress. The article calls for a rational reassessment of the relationship between civilization and the biosphere, free from the burden of Romantic illusions about nature's innate goodness.