This text provides a critical analysis of J. B. Souček’s claim that theologians inherently rely on philosophical categories and concepts. The author challenges the notion of a simple adoption of such concepts, arguing that a concept is not a static term but a construction established through a series of judgments. For a theologian to truly use a philosopher’s concept, they must re-judge it themselves; otherwise, the meaning shifts, resulting in a fundamentally different concept. The text rejects the idea that concepts evolve or change on their own, as seen in Hegelian thought. Instead, the identity of a concept is maintained through its relation to an intentional object. The purpose of a concept is not its own self-identity, but its capacity to ensure a guaranteed reference to an identical intentional object. This reflection emphasizes the dynamic process of thinking required to bridge philosophical methodology and theological inquiry, asserting that concepts must be actively recreated to retain their functional meaning.