This scholarly reflection focuses critically on the phenomenon of "immediate experience," which the author perceives as a deeply problematic and inherently flawed concept. According to the text, this notion burdens the entire empiricist tradition, particularly in its Anglo-American development, and serves as a prime example of the long-term harmful influence that falsely constituted intentional constructs exert on philosophical thought. The study explores the historical roots of this error, finding them in the environment of an older nominalist tradition that paved the way for this concept to assert itself so forcefully. The author does not settle for a mere description but analyzes the teleology of this concept—identifying where its acceptance leads and how it deforms our understanding of reality and knowledge. The objective is to expose the artificiality of this construct and warn against its uncritical use in contemporary epistemology, where it persists as an unquestioned dogma despite its unsustainable theoretical foundations.