This text explores the relationship between conceptual logic and the logic of an event, emphasizing the need to distinguish between the two. The author differentiates between logic within conceptual thinking and the logic manifested in a specific action or event. Any occurrence can be seen as an application of logos only insofar as it exhibits a certain unity. However, this unity should not be regarded as logical in the traditional sense, nor should it be attributed to a process of mental unification. Instead, it must be understood as inherent to the event itself. This unity is not an original or static property but is something established, maintained, and continuously formed throughout the event's duration. The text thus highlights the autonomy of the logos of an event relative to the abstract logic of thought, underscoring the dynamic nature of the unity that underlies all action. The reflection is based on a fragmentary text from Pisek, suggesting further development of these ontological questions.