This text offers a critical examination of the concept of "development" (or "evolution"), which has permeated numerous fields far beyond biology, often being used metaphorically without sufficient conceptual rigor. The author notes that the term's original meaning—the unfolding of what was previously "infolded"—has largely been lost in common usage, such as when describing political events or weather patterns. Building upon Hegel’s attempt to restore this meaning by emphasizing the internal nature of infolding, the author proposes a fundamental shift in perspective. He argues against the objectification of this interiority and suggests that the relationship between the "infolded" and the "unfolded" should not be viewed merely as a quantitative change. Instead, it must be recognized as a profound qualitative distinction between non-objectivity and objectivity. By redefining development as a transition between these two fundamentally different qualities of being, the text challenges the conventional, purely objective understanding of evolutionary processes.