This text explores the nature and function of the "topic" within philosophical inquiry. The author posits that selecting a topic is primarily an attempt to discover new approaches and paths, serving as a framework to maintain a meaningful and verifiable methodological process. A topic cannot be reduced to a mere title; it must be accompanied by a concise explanation that allows the reader to track the legitimacy of the philosophical progression. The essay critiques two prevalent extremes in modern philosophy: superficial "surfing," which briefly touches upon interesting points without substantive analysis, and the production of voluminous works that compile vast amounts of data without conceptual mastery. The author argues that a name or title is never devoid of context and warns against adopting established terminologies without rigorous thought. Ultimately, the text calls for a reflection on methodology that meets the serious demands of philosophical inquiry, emphasizing the need for genuine intellectual comprehension over the mere accumulation of information or fragmented observations.