This text analyzes the philosophical concept of 'making something an object' and provides a critique of its common usage. The author distinguishes between simple thematization—merely focusing attention on a topic—and the process of objectification, where a theme is mistakenly constructed as an object placed 'outside' or 'in front of' the self. A primary concern identified is the tendency to reduce complex realities to mere objects, which results in the neglect or denial of their non-objective aspects. The text highlights that many realities either lack an objective nature entirely or possess a profound non-objective dimension alongside their objective surface, which is devalued during standard objectification. The reflection focuses on the methodological challenge of how to thematize these non-objective realities without subjecting them to an impermissible reduction. Ultimately, the work contributes to the discussion on the limits of objectifying thought and the necessity of recognizing non-objective phenomena that require a different approach to knowledge and reflection.